There’s some logic in that:
- If my competitor’s rankings are good, his links must be working;
- If my competitor’s rankings are stable, his links must be good and safe.
While competitor research is an essential step in researching your niche and getting inspired, boldly copying your competitors’ link is NOT a good idea.
Here are some points against that statement:
- You never know which of those links really worked and which can be spammy: Chances are you’ll copy the easiest ones first (which are most likely to be the weaker ones), so you’ll spam your link profile from the very start;
- Your more established competitor must have a good reputation (trust) with Google, so he can get away with some percentage of spammy links. Newer sites don’t have that prerogative.
- Last but not the least:
if you copy what a competitor is doing… the best thing you can do is tie. To better your competition…. your strategy and its implementation must be better than your competitor
What are your thoughts?