Google has a new parent company, filed a patent for “watch time based rankings,” and more this week.
As always, our communities were buzzing at the news. But like any good conversation, there were plenty of interesting side-discussions about Twitter, content marketing, and URL structure as well.
Here’s a look at what you might have missed out on!
When searching in Google, local results used to show up in a “7-pack” of brief listings and Google map pin locations just below the search bar. Now, the 7-pack has shrunk to a 3-pack “Snak Pak,” or “Local Stack” as Mike Blumenthal calls it. Head on over to Threadwatch to find a discussion and a link to some useful reading about the switch.
Blumenthal recently assessed it saying,
“The new display certainly provides an increased opportunity for organic results. I am not sure what will happen on clicks for Adwords bur those businesses that were lower in the old display may feel compelled to double down on their Adwords activity.”
What differences in traffic, if any, have you noticed?
SEOs have been trumpeting the power of videos for some time now. But it’s important that your videos are of good quality and can engage with viewers.
Engagement will be more important than ever in the future: according to this dispatch from Threadwatch, Google has filed a patent labeled “watch time based ranking.” Bill Slawski speculates that it could give pages a boost if viewers stay and watch an on-page video for a certain amount of time. But on the other hand, videos that have poor watch time could do just the opposite.
Re-evaluate your video content now, lest your “thin” videos and low watch times result in disaster later!
Once again on Threadwatch, a user has paired a discussion on SEO Chat with a recent study featured on Search Engine Land’s website.
In the study, Bartosz Góralewicz provides details about an experiment he ran to determine the impact of CTR on organic rankings. In the thread from SEO Chat, a little older than the study, you can find users discussing more than just rankings. As a data signal, what does CTR mean for your website? Take a look!
Over the course of SEO Chat’s history, 301 redirect questions are probably among our most common.
There are a lot of specifics going into each redirect. Every site is a little different, so it can be scary for Webmasters even if they feel like the process is the same each time. It doesn’t help that misinformation about 301s and their use is everywhere.
In this thread, SEO Chatters are trying to clear the air and get to the truth of 301s.
Politicians and business folk with loose lips on social media might be revisited by the ghosts of their past soon. Gnip, a social data company snatched up by Twitter just last year, has launched an archive search API for Twitter users.
The API is able to pull information from all the way back when Twitter started nine years ago. Besides shaming people for their past mistakes, it could also be put to productive use studying past trends.
Return to a simpler time – a time that Cre8asiteforums user EGOL calls “The Age of BS Content.”
Spamming was easy in those days. Any content was “good” and had ranking power, even the worst garbage. EGOL writes,
“SEOs made their living trying to push doorway pages and rubbish to the top of the SERPs with paid links and link networks.” But, “…the flow of that BS stuff has slowed significantly.”
EGOL is an extremely knowledgeable and well-spoken member of our community, with years of experience. Give this thread a read and share your opinion – in your eyes, is content across the web improving in quality?
Maybe Google did something right!
If you were rebuilding a website from the ground up, as WebmasterWorld user ergophobe is, how would you change the URLs?
In this thread ergophobe identifies some problems with the elderly URLs from the site he’s working on and proposes some solutions. It’s quite a detailed thread with lots of links to older discussions – a real treasure chest of discussion about URL architecture.
There’s also some interesting discussion about Panda – with the update rolling out slowly, maybe the risks are too high to make broad changes. It might be best to wait until the waters calm.
Finally, maybe the biggest piece of national and corporate news being discussed in our communities. If you know Google, you know that they’ve got their fingers stuck into a lot of different pies. And for a while now, that’s made investors a little uneasy. If one pie goes rotten, what’s to save Google from getting its whole hands covered in muck?
That, partly, is the reason for the creation of Alphabet. Think of it like an umbrella springing up in a rainstorm. Google can continue to be itself, and its many different projects can go off “on their own” in relative safety. As WebmasterWorld admin engine writes,
“The company has grown into a massive business, and the range of other business services and developments mean that it cannot go on with the same management structure… From a financial perspective… they can now look at making each business standalone, as and when required, or retain it within the Google Alphabet family.”