Comments on: SEO Content Creation: WBP Website Content Writers. A CEO Post.

By: Leonard

Leonard — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:36:20 +0000

Thanks for the clarification Jim. This makes it a very attractive service indeed. And Jeremy, thanks for your time too.

By: Jim Boykin

Jim Boykin — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:11:37 +0000

Leonard, you’re wrong. Each of you would get your own unique pages. We’ll never reuse someones pages. We write specifically for someone based on what they want us to write for them, and those pages will be theirs to own, and we’ll never reuse them or sell them to someone else. These articles are also not pre written. People tell us what they want us to write for them, we write for them, give those articles to them, and never see those articles again. It’s all custom specifically for what someone wants.

By: Leonard

Leonard — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:07:39 +0000

Jeremy,

How then again is this original? Assuming if 5 people including myself sign up for Jim’s basic content creation service today and we want say…a topic on saving money, wouldn’t 5 of us get the same 15 pages? Do correct me if I am wrong.

By: Jeremy Luebke

Jeremy Luebke — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:26:21 +0000

Leonard,

There is no comparison because they are 2 completely different forms of content. One is Duplicate content which is worthless for SEO and the other is original.

PLR may work for some thing like free ebook offers in exchange for people signing up for a newsletter or something similar but it will not work for SEO.

By: Leonard

Leonard — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:38:12 +0000

Hi Jeremy,

Good PLR content that are keywords optimized and niche specific is definitely not free. I do agree with you about it not being original however. My main question is, given the price of Jim’s service, how does it stand out from the really good PLR sites…say Article Underground by Mike Liebner.

By: Jeremy Luebke

Jeremy Luebke — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:12:07 +0000

@Leonard

Your talking about duplicate content, not original. I can get the same thing for free from article directories with the same value. Who’s name is on the article is irrelevant when it is considered duplicate anyways.

By: Leonard

Leonard — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:54:59 +0000

Private Label Rights content or articles

By: Jim Boykin

Jim Boykin — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:53:25 +0000

PLR = ?

By: Leonard

Leonard — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:33:11 +0000

This service basically reinforces the saying that content is still king. But how much different & beneficial is this from PLR, considering the variation in price?

By: Phil Maher

Phil Maher — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 14:57:09 +0000

Hey Jim, Great service, I look forward to speaking with you on this.