<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Light Behind The Changes At We Build Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/we-build-pages-news/changes-at-wbp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/we-build-pages-news/changes-at-wbp/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughn Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/we-build-pages-news/changes-at-wbp/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughn Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/?p=76#comment-179</guid>
		<description>hi
lnm9mboc7o5gz82l
good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
lnm9mboc7o5gz82l<br />
good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking Back on 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/we-build-pages-news/changes-at-wbp/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Back on 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/?p=76#comment-178</guid>
		<description>[...] making some incredibly large changes this year.  Most notably, we stopped buying links and started transitioning into a full-scale Internet marketing company. And for awhile, that was kind of terrifying. It’s hard to leave a model that has been [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] making some incredibly large changes this year.  Most notably, we stopped buying links and started transitioning into a full-scale Internet marketing company. And for awhile, that was kind of terrifying. It’s hard to leave a model that has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Boykin: Paid Links Aren&#8217;t Worth It To Me</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/we-build-pages-news/changes-at-wbp/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Boykin: Paid Links Aren&#8217;t Worth It To Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/?p=76#comment-177</guid>
		<description>[...] Light Behind The Changes At We Build Pages [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Light Behind The Changes At We Build Pages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Van Horne</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/we-build-pages-news/changes-at-wbp/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Van Horne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/?p=76#comment-176</guid>
		<description>John, sorry but that is the way we all should go! Black hats don&#039;t do what White hats do. Divisive, hmm, playing with the industry repuatation isn&#039;t? A reputation that the industry let happen because we enabled these guys to come out from under the rock they belong under. There was a time when we knew when someone does that stuff it soils the whole industry. Now, the leaders of the industry just take their money and deflect the negatives for them just like the lobbyists do for the cigarette companies. It&#039;s BS and why we need to differentiate ourselves. Preferably by dropping the SEO altogether in preference to something like web site positioning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, sorry but that is the way we all should go! Black hats don&#8217;t do what White hats do. Divisive, hmm, playing with the industry repuatation isn&#8217;t? A reputation that the industry let happen because we enabled these guys to come out from under the rock they belong under. There was a time when we knew when someone does that stuff it soils the whole industry. Now, the leaders of the industry just take their money and deflect the negatives for them just like the lobbyists do for the cigarette companies. It&#8217;s BS and why we need to differentiate ourselves. Preferably by dropping the SEO altogether in preference to something like web site positioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/we-build-pages-news/changes-at-wbp/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/?p=76#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Congrats on having the guts to move and live around each other trying to build something. I made a joke a while ago to one of you that WBP the link company might become &quot;We Build Pages, Again&quot; but I wasn&#039;t aware the plans were already well underway.

My only concern is the use of the White Hat label. That&#039;s a divisive strategy that doesn&#039;t help the industry or it&#039;s White Hat players. It does help the Black Hat practitioners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on having the guts to move and live around each other trying to build something. I made a joke a while ago to one of you that WBP the link company might become &#8220;We Build Pages, Again&#8221; but I wasn&#8217;t aware the plans were already well underway.</p>
<p>My only concern is the use of the White Hat label. That&#8217;s a divisive strategy that doesn&#8217;t help the industry or it&#8217;s White Hat players. It does help the Black Hat practitioners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

